Good morning. With tensions rising in Taiwan, we look at the shared interests of China, Russia and Iran. |
| Vladimir Putin, left, and Xi Jinping in Beijing in February.Pool photo by Alexei Druzhinin |
|
Vladimir Putin has traveled outside the boundaries of the former Soviet Union only twice this year. Once was to visit China in February, and once was to visit Iran last month, my colleague David Sanger points out. |
Those two countries obviously have something in common. Like Russia, both China and Iran view the U.S. as an adversary. If the world is breaking into two competing blocs — democracy versus autocracy, as President Biden has put it — Russia, China, and Iran make up the core of the anti-U.S. bloc. And they recently seem to be increasing their cooperation. |
Their closer ties raise an alarming prospect: What if all three countries decide to confront the U.S. simultaneously sometime soon in an effort to overwhelm the American ability to respond? |
"I'm not predicting it," David told me, referring to the prospect of simultaneous acts of aggression from China, Iran and Russia. "But there is reason to think it's plausible, and our system can barely manage one big conflict at a time." |
| Anna Rose Layden for The New York Times |
|
The focus this week has turned to Taiwan. Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, may soon stop there, as part of her current tour of Asia, which would make her the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit the island in years. Newt Gingrich visited in 1997 when he was speaker, and Alex Azar, Trump's secretary of health and human services, went in 2020. |
Chinese officials have reacted angrily to Pelosi's planned visit, which underscores China's new aggression toward Taiwan. Xi Jinping, China's president, seemed to be referring to her last week when he told Biden that the U.S. should not "play with fire." Some U.S. intelligence officials believe that China may send fighter jets to escort Pelosi's plane as it approaches Taiwan or take steps in coming weeks to damage Taiwan's economy. |
Biden administration officials yesterday tried to warn China from taking aggressive action. "Our actions are not threatening and they break no new ground," John Kirby, a spokesman, said at the White House yesterday. "Nothing about this potential visit — potential visit — which oh, by the way, has precedent, would change the status quo." |
There are no easy choices for the U.S. in this situation. |
If Pelosi had canceled the visit, she would have been overruling the wishes of Taiwan's leaders. A visit, said my colleague Amy Qin, who is based in Taiwan, "boosts Taiwan's legitimacy on the international stage." |
As Edward Wong, a Times correspondent who covers diplomacy from Washington, said, "Supporters of the trip argue that it's the U.S. sending a message to Beijing that Taiwan is important enough to us that we are going to engage at senior levels." He described the trip as a version of "diplomatic deterrence," trying to remind China of the potential consequences if it did invade Taiwan. |
A cancellation, by contrast, would have risked sending the message that China can dictate American relations with Taiwan. It would have the potential to repeat the mistakes that the U.S. made with Putin over the past 20 years, when it repeatedly tried to appease him. |
Putin invaded Georgia, annexed Ukraine's Crimea peninsula, murdered Russian dissidents and intervened in the U.S. presidential election in 2016. Each time, the U.S. avoided major confrontation, partly out of a worry that it could spark a larger war. Putin, viewing the U.S. and Western Europe as weak, responded last year with a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. |
If China believes the U.S. won't ultimately come to Taiwan's defense, the chances of an invasion may increase. |
But the risks of a confrontational approach are also real. Pelosi's visit, for example, may lead Chinese airplanes to near Taiwan in new ways. "If they enter into Taiwan's territorial airspace, an incident could happen, whether Xi wants one or not," Bonnie Glaser, the director of the Asia Program at the German Marshall Fund of the U.S., told The Times. |
Cao Qun, a researcher at a state-run Chinese think tank, recently wrote: "The chances of a clash between China and the United States in the Taiwan Strait are growing." |
| Putin and Ebrahim Raisi, Iran's president, in Tehran in July.Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times |
|
None of this means that a coordinated campaign of aggression from China, Russia and Iran will necessarily happen in coming months. For one thing, the three countries have their own tensions, as David Sanger also notes. China and Russia have been longtime rivals for influence in Asia, and both — like the U.S. — would prefer that Iran not become a nuclear power. |
But the three countries also have one overarching shared goal: reducing the geopolitical influence of the U.S., Western Europe, Japan and their allies. Already, China, Russia and Iran have collaborated in recent months, especially in the purchase of Russian and Iranian energy. |
All three stand to benefit when the U.S. has to cope with multiple international crises at the same time. |
| Osama bin Laden, left, and Ayman al-Zawahri in 2001.Ausaf Newspaper for Daily Dawn, via Reuters |
|
- A U.S. drone strike in Afghanistan killed Ayman al-Zawahri, the leader of Al Qaeda, who helped plan the Sept. 11 attacks.
- Biden said the strike, in downtown Kabul over the weekend, did not kill any civilians or members of al-Zawahri's family.
- Al-Zawahri, 71, led a life steeped in conspiracy and violence. He also played roles in the attack on the destroyer Cole in 2000 and the 1998 embassy bombings in Africa that killed hundreds of Americans.
|
Hospitals are supposed to be transparent about how much procedures cost. Many aren't, Martin Schoeller argues in a Times Opinion video. |
Our journalism is possible only with the support of subscribers. Access all the news and analysis from our experts with The New York Times Basic Access subscription. Subscribe today. |
| The Hef, a bridge in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.Ilvy Njiokiktjien for The New York Times |
|
Lives Lived: Mick Moloney was a recording artist, folklorist, concert presenter and professor who championed Irish culture and encouraged female instrumentalists in a male-dominated field. He died at 77. |
| SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC |
| Richard III in three current productions.From left: David Hou; Sara Krulwich/The New York Times; Ellie Kurttz, via Royal Shakespeare Company |
|
Who should play the king? |
The eponymous king of Shakespeare's "Richard III" was found to have a deep curvature of his spine, likely a form of scoliosis. Should the role be reserved for actors with disabilities? Three productions are taking different approaches, Marc Tracy writes in The Times. |
It was once common for actors to play characters who were of a different race or gender or with disabilities that they didn't have. That practice has changed recently, as Hollywood has pushed to give more leading roles to actors from long-overlooked groups. But the shift toward authentic casting also brings a potential downside for women and marginalized groups, who may be kept from playing some of "the greatest, meatiest roles in the repertory," Marc writes. |
| David Malosh for The New York Times |
|
The pangram from yesterday's Spelling Bee was nomadic. Here is today's puzzle. |
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David |
"The Daily" is about the killing of al-Zawahri. |
Matthew Cullen, Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Ashley Wu contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com. |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment