Catching up with 'Better Call Saul' like a con artist

Plus, "Nope," Emmanuel the emu and a great new documentary.

View this email online by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when Comic-Con came back. It was the week when a drive-through wedding led to lots of opinions. And it was the week when we got new Kennedy Center honorees. Let's get to it Opening Argument: Catching up with Better Call Saul like a con artist (Caution: this piece contains Better Call Saul spoilers.) I absolutely loved Breaking Bad. If you think about consistency, quality, freshness, direction, acting, everything — I could easily argue for it as my personal best show ever. I wrote about it quite a bit, but when it ended, I was relieved, as I said close to the end of its run. It had been a brutal story to watch. So when Better Call Saul premiered about a year and a half later as the prequel spin-off tale of Walt's corrupt lawyer — played so brilliantly by Bob Odenkirk — I didn't stay with it. I didn't feel the need to be in that world again, regardless of my admiration for the personnel.  Frank Ockenfels/AMC Fast forward to the show's current tear toward its finale as it doles out the last six episodes of its sixth and final season. I'd seen a bit of it here and there and knew how critically revered it was by people whose tastes are often similar to mine. But I was woefully behind on all but about the first half of the first season. It was a daunting idea trying to process a show as intricate as this in a way that would let me catch up quickly; I was about 45 episodes behind and really wanted to catch up in about ... 10 days. Certainly not undoable, but with a show that contains this many detailed machinations and business dealings and people plotting against each other, I felt doubt. I wanted to try to experience the finale with everybody else, but could I? And then I remembered: It's a show about a con artist. Just take some shortcuts. He would encourage it.  First, it helped that I had already kept up, loosely, with the direction of the show. I knew about some big deaths, and I knew about the way the story was intersecting with the events of Breaking Bad. And obviously, Breaking Bad's very existence gives you a lot of hints about certain things that are or are not going to happen. Besides, it's been almost impossible to live in the pop-culture world (and the pop-culture social media timeline) without knowing quite a bit about what happens. So in a way, my first con was leaked intelligence.  My second con was cheat sheets. I read — or I should say I skimmed — summaries of every episode of the entire series before I caught up. This is heresy, you say. This is wrong. You snuffed out the surprises for yourself! To this I say that most of the surprises were already pre-snuffed, and I cannot tell you how much easier it is to keep up with the fine points and appreciate the execution when you know the basic outline. If you have ever watched an adaptation of a book you've already read, you've had a similar experience.  And remember, I never said I wasn't cheating.  My third con was working with a mole. A shout-out here to my great pal Alan Sepinwall, who has faithfully written about Saul in real time all along, and who was available for me to text with my questions. Usually, this took the form of double-checking when I lost my confidence that I was understanding what's going on. An actual text from me to Alan: "Okay this is what I mean when I say I lose track of who is doing what. So [person] was attacked while carrying [person's] bail money because ... the larger cartel didn't want him to get out on bail?" I was right, by the way, I just wanted to make sure I was right, because Alan (who also followed The Sopranos so faithfully) is candidly much better at keeping score on mafia/cartel/criminal-operation stuff than I am. It's hard to be a solo criminal — it's much easier with an accomplice. The fourth con? A little skimming. Don't misunderstand, I watched the vast majority of the 45 episodes I had missed. But here and there, where I knew what was happening and I was not going to enjoy it, as is often the case with brutal murders and certain kinds of slow burns, I did some skipping forward. I embezzled back a little of my own time, in other words. I am not, as I have told Alan and others, particularly a cartel person. I find those parts of the story a little less fresh and even a little uncomfortably stereotypical sometimes, so I don't need to watch every showdown between two scary dudes, and I definitely don't need to watch every killing. I almost quit on Breaking Bad when they started dissolving bodies in the first couple of episodes. I know myself.   Side note: When you are watching a show not in real time, sometimes you can also skip because you are immune to the kind of suspense they are using slow pacing to create, for reasons external to the story. An example: There is a section that I found interminably drawn-out and a little bit boring, which I eventually realized was probably because back when it was airing, it was the lead-up to the introduction of Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito), an iconic Breaking Bad character. What, people had every reason to wonder, would this be like? But I knew what Gus was like when he came back; I had already seen him on Saul. So the tease, tease, tease of when we were going to see Gus wasn't relevant to my experience, and the slow reveal of the Los Pollos Hermanos sign, which would have delighted me at the time, had less punch. There are those among you saying, "You didn't have the full experience!" and I agree. I couldn't, though; I didn't make room in the crowded landscape of everything to keep up with it. I didn't have access to the same experience I'd have had as a week-to-week or even season-binging viewer. But there are also those of you who know that out there, there is a show you have been dying to catch up on that you just find too daunting. You feel like you can't give that much mental energy to details for long enough to hang on. You feel like you don't necessarily really want to watch 45, or 60, or 100 episodes of whatever it is, but you are curious. Is it a sin, this con? I encourage you to remember that we used to watch television very differently. Back in the earlier days of many dramatic shows like Hill Street Blues or soaps like Dallas, it worked like this: You saw the episode or you didn't. You watched it or you missed it. If you missed it, the next time you would get a chance to see it was in summer reruns. We watched serialized stories with holes in them, and we filled the holes as best we could, because life is messy. Because sometimes back then, we were stuck at work or at a kid's recital or on a date and didn't see an episode — just like sometimes now, we are watching six other things or we're not in the mood for a murder show and we just let a terrific show get away from us. I encourage you not to stand on ceremony.  Cheat, cheat, cheat, if it's that or nothing at all. It's what Jimmy McGill would do. Four episodes to go. I can't wait.  Newsletter continues after sponsor message We Recommend I have been listening to the audiobook of Patrick Radden Keefe's excellent collection, Rogues, which brings together years of his longform reported stories about criminals and wrongdoing and general bad behavior. You'll hear about government corruption, death penalty defense, El Chapo, and Mark Burnett. It's an excellent book, and his narration is exceptional. (Note: His publisher shares a parent company, Penguin Random House, with mine.) You've probably already seen Emmanuel the emu, right? Staring into the camera getting ready to peck it senseless while his best friend tells him, "Emmanuel, don't do it"? Well, make sure you're following the account Knuckle Bump Farms, because it's a lot of fun.  It sounds kind of depressing, but the series Dan Kois is running over at Slate on the 50 Best Fictional Deaths is really interesting and covers a lot of ground. Good stuff.  A note: We're going to be talking about The Wire on an upcoming episode, and we'd love to hear your questions. What should we talk about? Send us a question in a voice memo at pchh@npr.org.  What We Did This Week Alicia Vera/HBO Max Aisha reviewed the new HBO MAX series Rap Sh!t, executive produced by Issa Rae. I wrote about how much I loved the documentary series The Last Movie Stars, also on HBO MAX, which is about Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward. We'll be covering it on the show next week if you want to be ready for a lot of movie and marriage talk.  Aisha talked to Marc Rivers, Joelle Monique and Christina Lee about Jordan Peele's new film Nope. She also wrote about the movie.  Aisha, Glen, Stephen and I sat down together to debate the best movie soundtracks of all time. Stephen talked to Christina Lee about Lizzo's album Special. I talked to Margaret H. Willison and Cate Young about the Netflix adaptation of Jane Austen's Persuasion. We sent up an encore of our episode about the first season of Only Murders In The Building, where Glen and Aisha talked to J.C. Howard. What's Making Us Happy Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: What's making Christina Lee happy: The Movement Made Us by By David J. Dennis Jr. What's making Joelle Monique happy: The Protagonist's Journey by Scott Myers What's making Marc Rivers happy: Hurricane Season and Paradais by Fernanda Melchor What's making Aisha happy: A Strange Loop   Stream your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream. Subscribe to Pop Culture Happy Hour+. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes. What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: pchh@npr.org Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can sign up here. Looking for more great content? Check out all of our newsletter offerings — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 Unsubscribe  |  Privacy Policy