The Morning: Picking their fights

Democrats have a chance to do so.

Good morning. Creating temporary government programs could have big political benefits for Democrats.

The U.S. Capitol building.Samuel Corum for The New York Times

Winning by losing

President Biden and congressional Democrats are now trying to cut their original $3.5 trillion family-policy plan roughly in half, so that it can win enough moderate votes to pass.

In doing so, Democrats have two basic options: Fewer ideas or fewer years.

The first option involves eliminating entire programs from the plan. The second involves keeping nearly all of them — including universal pre-K, child tax credits, paid family leave and expanded health care access — but having some expire after only a few years.

There are reasonable arguments in favor of both approaches. Restricting the bill to fewer programs would create more certainty about the future of federal policy. It would allow government officials to focus on the remaining programs and allow families to plan for the future confidently.

A broader, temporary approach, on the other hand, would allow Democratic leaders in Congress to satisfy more of their members: Some care deeply about expanding Medicaid, for example, while others care more about Medicare. The temporary approach might also prove to be less temporary than it initially seemed — because a future Congress might decide to extend the programs.

These competing arguments have received a significant amount of attention. But there is also one argument for the Democrats to choose the temporary approach that has not received as much attention. It involves electoral politics, and it's the subject of today's newsletter.

'A good foothold'

A crucial aspect of the Democrats' economic agenda is its popularity.

Expanding Medicaid is so popular that it has won voter referendums in red states like Idaho, Missouri, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Utah. Adding dental coverage to Medicare — another proposal in the Democrats' original plan — is favored by about 70 percent of voters, polls suggest. Most Americans also favor larger child tax credits and federal funding for pre-K.

The level of support for each idea can vary depending on the precise wording of poll questions, but the overall pattern is clear. A majority of Americans, including many swing voters and some Republicans, supports larger health care and education programs, tax cuts for the middle class and tax increases on the rich. (The tax increases would help pay for the other policies.)

Senators Tammy Baldwin and Raphael Warnock.J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press

The popularity of these ideas is why some observers believe that a future Congress might choose to extend any temporary measures that Democrats pass now. Throughout U.S. history, government programs providing broad-based economic benefits have rarely been eliminated once created. "The idea is that these initiatives will get a good foothold in this legislation, and we can extend them," Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, told my colleague Carl Hulse.

Carl has been reporting on Washington politics since the 1980s, and he says he has covered only one program of any significance that Congress started but did not continue: the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988. It proved to be unpopular because it failed to provide the benefits that older Americans expected.

Most policies in the Democrats' original proposal seem unlikely to suffer from that problem. They would provide thousands of dollars a year, in direct payments or benefits, to many families.

Obamacare, on repeat

Still, Republican opposition to the bill is sufficiently strong that it's easy to imagine a future Congress, controlled at least partly by Republicans, refusing to extend the programs. And that's where the unappreciated political advantage for Democrats comes into play.

In American politics today, Republicans often try to emphasize a set of social issues on which many Democrats — especially progressives who receive a lot of media attention — are to the left of public opinion.

On immigration, some Democrats have become uncomfortable talking about almost any deportations or border security; most Americans, by contrast, favor immigration enforcement. On policing, progressive activists popularized the slogan "defund the police;" most voters — including most voters of color — oppose cuts to police budgets. On abortion, many Democrats oppose almost all restrictions; most Americans favor at least some.

It's not that a majority of Americans necessarily favors the Republican positions on these issues. The problem for Democrats is that they have left themselves vulnerable to accusations of being extreme. (In the current Virginia governor's campaign, the Republican nominee, Glenn Youngkin, is trying to pull off an upset with this strategy.)

The politics of economic policies tend to be different — and more favorable to Democrats.

By passing a bill with temporary programs in it, Democrats would be ensuring that the next few years would be filled with debates over economic issues, like the child tax credit, pre-K, paid family leave and Medicare. Republicans would much rather be talking about crime, immigration or critical race theory instead.

A bill full of temporary programs would effectively recreate the political dynamics around Obamacare repeal. Democrats would be defending a government program that provided tangible benefits to millions of Americans. Republicans would be left to explain why they opposed those popular benefits.

If Congress extended the programs in future years, Democrats would achieve some major policy objectives. If Congress let the programs lapse, Republicans could have some political headaches.

For more:

THE LATEST NEWS

The Virus
Politics
Other Big Stories
Mogadishu's streets bear the scars of war.Tyler Hicks/The New York Times
Opinions

By fighting to keep loopholes open, Republicans are "aiding and abetting tax evasion," The Times's Binyamin Appelbaum writes.

Maureen Dowd on the legacy of Colin Powell, and Ross Douthat on chronic illness.

When you subscribe to The New York Times, you're helping support journalists who are uncovering stories around the world, holding power to account and keeping the public informed. Become a subscriber today.

ADVERTISEMENT

MORNING READS

Termarr Johnson of Atlanta, a top amateur baseball prospect.Kendrick Brinson for The New York Times

Pastime: Baseball is trying to regain its cool.

Hacked: "I didn't even have to click on a link for my phone to be infected."

The crown: One of the toughest places to be a woman in Japan? Inside the royal family.

Quiz time: The average score on our most recent news quiz was 9.3. Can you do better?

Lives Lived: James Michael Tyler, who played Gunther on "Friends," started as an extra on the show. "His unique spirit caught our eye and we knew we had to make him a character," the show's co-creators said. Tyler died at 59.

ARTS AND IDEAS

Toni MorrisonPS Spencer

Inside the Book Review's archives

It's The New York Times Book Review's 125th birthday. To celebrate, we're stepping into the archives. Some highlights:

Best-sellers: Though the first issue of the Book Review was in 1896, the best-seller list as we know it made its first appearance in the Aug. 9, 1942, issue. It included a chart that showed how books were selling in 14 U.S. cities.

A classic: When "Song of Solomon," Toni Morrison's third novel, came out, The Times's reviewer thought it depicted "the possibility of transcendence within human life." He called the book a "full novel … not the two-hour penny dreadful which is again in vogue nor one of the airless cat's cradles custom-woven for the delight and job-assistance of graduate students."

Feedback: The Book Review's letters page was the internet message board of its day, where readers and authors sent in their grievances. "Are all of Henry James's books as hopelessly bad as 'The Spoils of Poynton'?" a reader asked in 1899.

For more: Here are all the stories, including what the Book Review thought of "Ulysses" by James Joyce and "The Age of Innocence" by Edith Wharton. — Claire Moses, a Morning writer

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook
Ryan Liebe for The New York Times

Think of this as the most luxurious Hamburger Helper you've ever had.

What to Watch

An Argentine psychological thriller, a charming Korean drama and more — stream these five international movies.

What to Listen to

Singing, scraping metal, inventing instruments: Hans Zimmer set out to make sounds that nobody had heard before for the otherworldly movie "Dune."

Late Night

Jason Sudeikis hosted "Saturday Night Live," reprising his role as Biden.

Now Time to Play

The pangrams from Friday's Spelling Bee were dehumidified and humidified. Here is today's puzzle — or you can play online.

Here's today's Mini Crossword, and a clue: Wine barrels (five letters).

If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David

P.S. The Book Review is hosting a live 125th anniversary celebration today at 1 p.m. Eastern, featuring trivia and celebrity readings.

"The Daily" is about China's economy.

Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti, Ashley Wu and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Morning newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments: